Home |    The EXW Study |    Church Jobs |    Free Newsletter |    Worship Music |    Forums    
EXW >  Forums
Search:

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups      RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Gadgets Sites
  • pdaBlast!
  • Pocket PC
  • Palm
  • Clie
  • Treo
  • Blackberry
  • Symbian
  • iPod
  • iPhone
  • SmartPhones
  • Gadgets
  • What is Traditional Worship

     
    Post new topic   Reply to topic    EXW Forum Index -> Traditional Worship
    View previous topic :: View next topic  
    Author Message
    brianlove84



    Joined: 14 Jan 2008
    Posts: 7

    PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:53 pm    Post subject: What is Traditional Worship Reply with quote

    How is ti different from Modern Worship? What specific factor classify a traditional worship? I'm very interested to know. I've heard inklings of such things, but never witnessed them.

    Sam
    Fontana
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message
    Steve Hotra



    Joined: 16 Oct 2005
    Posts: 47
    Location: Vancouver, WA. USA

    PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    Traditional worship could be defined by:
    1) song selection, usually hymns.
    2) instruments used: organ, piano
    3) instruments not used: electric rock guitars, synths, drums

    I feel that there are some great traditional songs that are being used today:
    Come Thou Fount, Be Thou My Vision, and of course How great Thou Art.

    I like introducing new chords and beats to traditional worship, just to keep the lyrics in from of my church. Some of these songs are awesome!
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
    jonallen



    Joined: 06 Jan 2008
    Posts: 11
    Location: Lakeland, FL

    PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

    I noticed that all the songs mentioned had the word "Thou" in them icon_wink.gif

    Traditional styles are pretty much how Steve said, organs, pianos, choirs, and occasionally brass and woodwind instruments. Concepts of classical music are used often, including melody, harmony, rhythm, counter-rhythm, etc. Contemporary follows styles similar to alternative rock and 50's era rock-n-roll: lead singer, acoustic guitar, electric guitar, bass guitar, drum kit, keyboard, back-up singers, and the infamous Verse-Verse-Chorus-Verse-Chorus-Bridge-Chorus(ad-nauseum) song structure.

    Lyrically, traditional hymns typically kept God as the subject. In newer/contemporary songs the subject is commonly the singer.

    Examples:
    "As the deer panteth for the water, So my soul longeth after thee..."

    "Here I am to worship, Here I am to bow down, Here I am to say that You're my God"

    "Come, now is the time to worship, Come, now is the time to give your heart"

    "This is the air I breathe, This is the air I breathe, Your holy presence living in me"

    There is a fallacy in identifying songs as "contemporary" however, because what is contemporary is always changing. So I would be tempted to classify M.W. Smith and Brian Doerksen as "modern". Of course there is post-modern worship, which I would guess would include Leeland and Hillsong United music. The trend lately is to tell stories and revisit folk-styles as well as simplify lyric content further than modern music ever did.

    Being into progressive styles I find this trend very disturbing because I find the quality of modern musicianship lacking. The advent of MP3s and internet delivery has only aided this regression towards lower-quality recordings/mastering and (apparently) songwriting.
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
    MPaisley



    Joined: 17 Dec 2008
    Posts: 1
    Location: New Life Baptist Church - Yulee, FL

    PostPosted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

    I agree with johnallen. I have commented with several ministry patrners that most songs today are not written with the same dedication to biblical doctrine and truth as in the days of Fannie Crosby and others like her. This does not mean that I crucify all "contemporary" or "modern" music and songwriters. If a song is lined up with scripture, I can listen to and incorporate into the song service the music of MWS, Stephen C. Chapman, etc. But I refuse to use songs strictly due to the fact that they are popular.
    _________________
    Romans 6:4 "Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
    NuYearsEve



    Joined: 15 Apr 2009
    Posts: 9

    PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    The examples the above poster gave of "traditional" and "modern" songs seems a bit contrived to help make their point, however, I hope you will look at it like this....

    1.) Both traditional and modern worship can have benefits and drawbacks. It MOSTLY depends on the heart of the worshiper. The traditional method vs the modern method is simply a vehicle. I wouldn't place a lot of concern on it. Choose one or both that helps you worship and go for it (so long as its biblical)

    2.) Think of "most" traditional music as singing about God and "most" contemporary as singing to God.

    Just my thought.
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message
    Gimble



    Joined: 03 Oct 2007
    Posts: 9

    PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    > ...most songs today are not written with the same
    > dedication to biblical doctrine and truth as in the days
    > of Fannie Crosby and others like her.

    I don't entirely agree. Sorry for the long delay before this post, but I've been thinking about this thread for several weeks.

    There are three factors I can think of that affect today's music and the musical complexity and doctrine which tend to have a more "unfavorable" light than the tried-and-true:

    * The test of time has not been applied. Name the top ten worship songs of the 1520s! Off the top of my head, I can name only one ("A Mighty Fortress Is Our God"). It's not that bad music/theology wasn't being written during that time, it's that the songs have been forgotten, as likely they should have been.

    * It's my guess that more music is being written now than ever before in history. That has something to do with having billions of people on the planet, instead of millions. More music means more bad music (and possibly more good music) is being written.

    * Music has a much wider audience now than it ever has before. In the '50s, until you were able to get your new-fangled song in a music book, the audience for your song was decidedly local. Now, with the Internet and mass media, it's fairly easy to find lots of new music, with huge variations in quality of musicianship and doctrine.

    > If a song is lined up with scripture, I can listen to
    > and incorporate into the song service the music of MWS,
    > Stephen C. Chapman, etc. But I refuse to use songs strictly
    > due to the fact that they are popular.

    No argument here. I'm finding something I'm now trying to do is to take some new music and adjust -- hopefully improve -- it. Usually, it's a second-tier song (changing a well known song from any millenia causes complaints), and I try to rewrite and expande lyrics.

    I have no gift with creating new melodies from scratch, but I can pitch in by taking a good song with lousy lyrics and trying to fix it to be honoring to God and not mind-numbingly repetitive.

    We have the biggest repertoire of music to choose from in history, with tried-and-true selections as well as lots of new choices. Filtering out the bad from the good, and finding music that is honoring to God, may be more challenging now than ever before.
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message
    Chrish_Tiyan



    Joined: 31 Aug 2009
    Posts: 11

    PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

    I would like to share to you the prophetic gift of Kim Clement, his music has drawn a broad audience from different walks of life; his path through life continues to be an exciting adventure of http://kimclement.com/[/url]
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message
    Display posts from previous:   
    Post new topic   Reply to topic    EXW Forum Index -> Traditional Worship All times are GMT
    Page 1 of 1

     
    Jump to:  
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum


    p-h-p-B-B © 2001, 2002 p.h.p.B.B Group



    Experiencing Worship, The Study
    Used by churches all over the world to help teach worship, the Experiencing Worship study can help your worship team too. Your team will learn why we worship and gain a better understanding of how to worship. One user said..."Your 5 week study course has made a tremendous impact on my life in the study of worship... I would like to express my thanks for a well written study course that leads into a higher realm of praise and worship."

    Order the study today!

    The Paul Langford Project
    This is the debut album by EXW friend Paul Langford. Paul is a Chicago based singer, arranger, keyboardist, producer and conductor. Paul has a career that spans 14 years. Paul's work includes arranging for groups like GLAD, Voices of Liberty, VoiceTrek, The Chicago based "Caroling Party" and Day of Discovery Singers. His arranging has appeared on recordings side by side with greats like Gene Puerling and David Maddux, and he has sung with Don Shelton, Bonnie Herman and Bob Bowker, among others.

    Order the Project today!




    Advertise | Contact Us Church Jobs | about EXW
     EXW | Worship Studies | Music | Drama Copyright © 2001-2004 by C. M. Press, LLC.